AI Governance Audit

The AI governance audit built for educational institutions

Q: Who is Auditra built for?

Auditra is designed for two primary users: AI governance consultants who run live audit sessions with educational institutions, and institution administrators — vice-rectors, faculty deans, or heads of academic quality — who need a structured, credible assessment they can present to a governing board.

Q: What does the audit output look like?

You receive a scored readiness report covering all six risk domains, with a domain-level score (0–100), a risk classification, identified gaps, and recommended next steps. The report is formatted for direct board presentation and is downloadable as a PDF. The policy draft is a separate, editable document generated from your audit responses.

Q: Can we use Auditra in a live session with a client?

Yes — consultant mode is a first-class feature. The interface is designed to be presented on-screen during a client session. You work through the domains together, and the client receives the scored report and policy draft at the end.

Q: How does the policy generation work?

Auditra auto-populates a structured AI use policy from your audit responses — drawing on your institution's specific answers to create tailored language rather than a generic template. You can edit the draft in-tool, download it as a formatted document, or export it to your institution's own template.

Q: Is Auditra compliant with GDPR?

Auditra is designed with GDPR compliance as a baseline requirement. Data is processed and stored in EU infrastructure. Institution subscribers receive a data-processing agreement as part of their annual licence.

Q: How long does an audit take?

A typical institution audit takes 45–75 minutes in a guided session. Self-serve completions can be paused and resumed, with all responses saved between sessions.

Assess your institution's AI readiness across six risk domains and generate a tailored policy draft — ready to present to your board.

Request access See how it works

GDPR-aware by design

EU AI Act aligned

Board-ready outputs

Readiness Report

University of Applied Sciences

Overall score

62/100

Domain Scores

Academic Integrity 58

Faculty AI Literacy 44

Student Use Guidelines 71

Data Privacy & Procurement 65

Tool Assessment 80

Governance Structure 55

Policy draft ready

Download PDF

Built for institutions across Europe

Universities

Teacher Colleges

Research Institutes

K–12 Networks

Accreditation Bodies

GDPR Compliant

EU AI Act Aligned

Data stays in EU

Board-ready export

AI is already in your classrooms. Your governance framework probably is not.

Most institutions face the same three-way bind: faculty using AI tools without clear guidelines, academic integrity policies written before generative AI existed, and procurement decisions made without a data-privacy review.

A governing board needs a credible, structured answer. A vague policy document, a free questionnaire output, or a generic enterprise risk report does not meet that bar.

Generic tools miss the educational context

Enterprise AI governance software is built for financial services and healthcare. Free quiz tools are built for K–12 pastoral care. Neither addresses faculty AI literacy, assessment design integrity, or EU-regulated student data.

One session, no deliverable

Consultants running live governance workshops leave with notes and a blank policy template. Clients leave with no scored output, no board-ready report, and no clear next step.

Policy without audit is just aspiration

A policy that does not reflect an actual readiness assessment — across procurement, faculty literacy, student use, and data risk — is not a governance document. It is a liability.

Six domains. One structured audit.

Auditra's readiness assessment covers every risk dimension that matters for educational AI governance — from the lecture hall to the data-processing register.

Academic Integrity & Assessment Design

How well does your institution detect, respond to, and design around AI-assisted academic misconduct? Assessment design, plagiarism policy, and examination integrity are scored separately.

Assessment policyMisconduct detectionExam integrity

Faculty AI Literacy

Can your teaching staff critically evaluate AI-generated content, guide students responsibly, and use AI tools effectively in pedagogy? Literacy gaps create inconsistent student experiences.

Staff trainingCritical evaluationPedagogical use

Student Use Guidelines

Are your student-facing AI use guidelines clear, consistent across faculties, and updated for generative tools? Vague guidelines produce anxiety and inequitable outcomes.

Permitted useCross-faculty consistencyCommunication

Data Privacy & Tool Procurement

Do your AI tool procurement processes include a GDPR-compliant data-protection impact assessment? Student and staff data risk is one of the highest-liability governance gaps.

DPIA processVendor assessmentGDPR compliance

AI Tool Assessment Framework

Does your institution have a structured method for evaluating which AI tools are approved, on what conditions, and for what purposes? Ad-hoc approval is not a framework.

Approval processUse conditionsRisk classification

Governance Structure & Accountability

Who owns AI governance at your institution? Is there a designated body, a defined escalation path, and a review cadence? Without accountability, no policy survives contact with the year ahead.

OwnershipReview cadenceEscalation paths

A professional audit tool, not another form

Auditra runs as a guided session — one domain at a time — and assembles the scored report and policy draft as you go. Consultants run it live. Institution leaders complete it independently.

Run the guided audit

Work through each of the six domains in a structured wizard. Questions are calibrated for educational contexts — not generic corporate risk language. Supports paste-in of existing policies for reference.

Review the scored readiness report

Each domain is scored and benchmarked. The report identifies priority gaps, risk levels, and areas of strength — in a format designed to be presented directly to a governing board.

Generate and edit the policy draft

Auditra auto-populates a tailored AI use policy from your audit responses. Edit in-tool, download as a formatted document, or export to your institution's template.

Request access

auditra.app — Domain 2 of 6: Faculty AI Literacy

2 / 6

Faculty AI Literacy — Question 3 of 8

Does your institution provide structured AI literacy training for teaching staff?

Yes — mandatory training for all staff

Yes — optional training available

Informal guidance only

No training provision currently

risk domains

Covering every dimension of educational AI governance

audit questions

Calibrated specifically for universities and schools

<60

minutes

Typical session time for a complete institution audit

100%

policy output

Every audit generates a tailored, editable policy draft

“

The board asked for a credible AI governance report. We had six weeks. Auditra turned a complex institution-wide assessment into a structured session we could run in an afternoon — and walk into the board meeting with a scored deliverable.

Head of Academic Quality

Northern European University of Technology

Consultant-ready

Designed to run live with a client on-screen — not just as a form to fill in later.

Self-serve too

Institution administrators can complete the audit independently and receive outputs by email.

EU-contextualised

Questions and policy output reflect EU AI Act obligations and GDPR data-handling requirements.

Transparent pricing for consultants and institutions

Two access modes. No hidden audit limits. Export included on all plans.

Consultant

€79 / audit session

Per institution audit. No subscription required.

Full six-domain guided audit
Scored readiness report (PDF export)
Auto-populated policy draft
Consultant-mode: live session screen layout
Client email delivery of report
Existing policy paste-in / upload

Request access

Frequently asked questions

Questions not answered here? Contact us.

Who is Auditra built for?

Auditra is designed for two primary users: AI governance consultants who run live audit sessions with educational institutions, and institution administrators — vice-rectors, faculty deans, or heads of academic quality — who need a structured, credible assessment they can present to a governing board. It is not a quiz tool for individual teachers.

What does the audit output look like?

You receive a scored readiness report covering all six risk domains, with a domain-level score (0–100), a risk classification (foundational / developing / established), identified gaps, and recommended next steps. The report is formatted for direct board presentation and is downloadable as a PDF. The policy draft is a separate, editable document generated from your audit responses.

Can we use Auditra in a live session with a client?

Yes — consultant mode is a first-class feature. The interface is designed to be presented on-screen during a client session. You work through the domains together, and the client receives the scored report and policy draft at the end. There is no need to reformat outputs after the session.

How does the policy generation work?

Auditra auto-populates a structured AI use policy from your audit responses — drawing on your institution's specific answers to create tailored language rather than a generic template. You can edit the draft in-tool, download it as a formatted document, or export it to your institution's own template. Existing policies can be uploaded for reference during the audit.

Is Auditra compliant with GDPR?

Auditra is designed with GDPR compliance as a baseline requirement, not an afterthought. Data is processed and stored in EU infrastructure. Institution subscribers receive a data-processing agreement as part of their annual licence. The audit itself includes a dedicated domain assessing your institution's own GDPR-related AI tool procurement practices.

How does Auditra address the EU AI Act?

The six-domain audit framework is aligned with the risk assessment and documentation requirements relevant to educational institutions under the EU AI Act. Questions in the data privacy, procurement, and governance domains specifically address high-risk AI system classification and the record-keeping obligations the Act introduces.

How long does an audit take?

A typical institution audit takes 45–75 minutes in a guided session. The time varies depending on how detailed the discussion is in each domain and whether existing policy documents are reviewed. Self-serve completions can be paused and resumed, with all responses saved between sessions.

Your institution's AI readiness,
assessed and actioned

Request access to Auditra and run your first institution audit — with a scored report and tailored policy draft ready for your governing board.

Available for EU and Nordic institutions. Early access pricing applies.

GDPR compliant